Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G is better than nubia Z20, getting a score of 84.6 against 71.9. The Galaxy A22 5G design has the same thickness than the nubia Z20, but it's just a little bit heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A22 5G has an older 11 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Z20 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixel number in each screen inch. The nubia Z20 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Z20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A22 5G has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Z20, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB. Nubia Z20 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a 48 mega-pixels camera in the back, the nubia Z20 also has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger camera aperture.
Galaxy A22 5G features improved battery lifetime than nubia Z20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.