Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-14 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A6 is slightly better than the nubia Z20, having a general score of 75.8 against 71.9. Samsung Galaxy A6's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Z20, although it was released just 17 months before. The nubia Z20 counts with a faster processing unit than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Z20 also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Nubia Z20 features a more vivid screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a little bigger screen, more pixels per inch of display and a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Nubia Z20 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the nubia Z20 also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way higher 48 megapixels resolution camera.
Nubia Z20 features a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The nubia Z20 features improved battery performance than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy A6 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.