Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-14 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a global score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than nubia Z20's 71.9 general score. The Galaxy A70 construction is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Z20, even though both of them were released with only a few months difference. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Z20 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better screen density. The nubia Z20 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Z20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy A70 has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Z20, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Nubia Z20 captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Z20 also has a lot better video resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a little longer battery life than nubia Z20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy A70 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.