Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-14 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than nubia Z20, with a 97.6 score against 71.9. Both devices in this comparison come with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system). Galaxy Fold's design is much thinner but way heavier than nubia Z20, and both of them were released only 1 months apart. Nubia Z20 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Z20, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The nubia Z20 and the Samsung Galaxy Fold both feature incredibly similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a greater amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than nubia Z20, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. Nubia Z20 counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos.
Galaxy Fold costs a lot more than the nubia Z20, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.