Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than nubia Z20, getting a 98.9 score against 71.9. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is heavier than the nubia Z20, it's a bit thinner and also newer.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than nubia Z20, because it has a little bit larger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Z20, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better processing power than nubia Z20, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better battery performance than nubia Z20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior camera than nubia Z20, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a much larger camera sensor, higher 24 fps video frame rate and a way higher 108 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot more expensive than nubia Z20, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.