Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 is much better than the nubia Z20, having a global score of 81.2 against 71.9. These devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even though Galaxy Note 3 is older than the nubia Z20, it's design is a little lighter and a bit thinner.
Nubia Z20 features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster) and 5 GB more RAM. Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better display than nubia Z20, although it has a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite smaller screen.
The nubia Z20 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a way higher video resolution, a much larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and video, a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a lot larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
The nubia Z20 has a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Nubia Z20 features longer battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy Note 3 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.