Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-14 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is much better than nubia Z20, with an 88.3 score against 71.9. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy S10's body is lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Z20, although they were released only a few months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a little more vivid screen than nubia Z20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040px resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy S10 has a much bigger storage for applications and games than nubia Z20, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy S10 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Nubia Z20 has a little faster CPU than Galaxy S10. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Nubia Z20 counts with superior battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3400mAh. Nubia Z20 takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot more MP camera.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S10 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.