Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-14 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is way better than the nubia Z20's general score of 71.9. Galaxy S10e is a somewhat thinner and lighter phone than the nubia Z20, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart. The nubia Z20 features a bit better screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit worse pixel count in each display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than nubia Z20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. Nubia Z20 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Z20 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Nubia Z20 has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3100mAh. Nubia Z20 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution, a much higher video quality and a way larger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy S10e not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.