Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than nubia Z20, having a 98 score against 71.9. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a somewhat heavier cellphone than the nubia Z20, but both of them are equally thin. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a slightly better looking screen than nubia Z20, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a greater screen density and a bit bigger display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Z20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's processing unit is very similar to the processor in nubia Z20, and although the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a higher amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a better camera than nubia Z20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution and a same size sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with higher video frame rates and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has improved battery life than nubia Z20, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way more expensive than the nubia Z20, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.