Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a lot better than the nubia Z20, with a general score of 93.4 against 71.9. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has 13 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Samsung Galaxy S22's construction is extremely newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the nubia Z20.
The nubia Z20 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S22. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM memory. Galaxy S22 has a brighter screen than nubia Z20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and much more brightness.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 captures much better photos and videos than nubia Z20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking images or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a camera in the back with a better resolution, better 24 frames per second video frame rates and a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has as much storage capacity for apps and games as the nubia Z20 one, both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The nubia Z20 features a bit better battery life than Galaxy S22, because it has an 8% more battery size.
The Galaxy S22 is a lot more expensive than the nubia Z20, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.