Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-14 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is much better than nubia Z20's overall score of 71.9. Galaxy S7 is an extremely older cellphone than nubia Z20, but it is thinner and lighter anyway. The Galaxy S7 counts with a more vivid display than nubia Z20, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch, a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a way brighter display.
The nubia Z20 has more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Nubia Z20 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S7, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The nubia Z20 has improved battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The nubia Z20 takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S7, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the nubia Z20 also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy S7 not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.