Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro is slightly better than the nubia Z20, having a 78.3 score against 71.9. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X70 Pro has 11 version and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie. The vivo X70 Pro body is newer, just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Z20.
Nubia Z20 has a little more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit better screen density. Vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than nubia Z20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Z20, because it has more internal storage capacity. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a bit better battery life than nubia Z20, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity. The vivo X70 Pro features just a bit better camera than nubia Z20, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the vivo X70 Pro also has a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.