Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.0 Lollipop | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-04-01 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.09 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is much better than nubia Z9 Max, having a score of 91.8 against 61.4. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a incredibly newer cellphone than the nubia Z9 Max, but it is somewhat heavier and a little thicker. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version and nubia Z9 Max has Android 5.0 Lollipop.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little more vivid display than nubia Z9 Max, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger display. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than nubia Z9 Max, because it has 112 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a bit better hardware performance than nubia Z9 Max, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a way better camera than nubia Z9 Max, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger aperture, a lot bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a very superior battery performance than nubia Z9 Max, because it has a 55 percent larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the nubia Z9 Max, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.