Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 5.0 Lollipop | -- |
| 2015-04-01 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.09 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is much better than nubia Z9 Max's score of 61.4. Even though Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is extremely newer than the nubia Z9 Max, it's a little heavier and thicker. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a slightly better display than nubia Z9 Max, because it has a quite larger screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2246px and a just a little more pixels per display inch.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit better performance than nubia Z9 Max, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than nubia Z9 Max, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 256 GB and 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a way better battery duration than nubia Z9 Max, because it has a 38% greater battery size. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a slightly better camera than nubia Z9 Max, because although it has a way less MP camera in the back and a lower video definition, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor and a larger camera aperture.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs a little more money than the nubia Z9 Max, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.