Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.3 | 75 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Microsoft |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Windows 10 Mobile |
| 2017-05-13 | 2015-10-06 |
| 6.04 x 2.96 x 0.29 inches | 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 320.00 | $ 325.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3340mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Lumia 950 XL has a general score of 75, which is much better than the OPPO F3's 63.3 overall score. Even being the best in our current comparison, Lumia 950 XL is an older, just a little bit thicker and a little heavier cellphone than OPPO F3. The Lumia 950 XL has Windows 10 Mobile operating system, and OPPO F3 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow operating system.
The OPPO F3 counts with a little bit better performance than Lumia 950 XL, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 7 more cores. The Microsoft Lumia 950 XL has a better looking display than OPPO F3, because it has a better 2560 x 1440px resolution, a better display density and a little larger display.
The OPPO F3 features a superior memory to install applications and games than Lumia 950 XL, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB and 32 GB more internal memory. The Lumia 950 XL features a superior camera than OPPO F3, because it has a much more mega pixels back camera, a way better 3840x2160 video definition, a larger camera aperture for better low light images and a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Microsoft Lumia 950 XL counts with just a bit longer battery duration than OPPO F3, because it has 3340mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL costs a little more than OPPO F3, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.