Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus has a global score of 87.1, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite's score of 74.4. IPhone 8 Plus's body is a little thinner than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, but it's heavier and was released many years before. IPhone 8 Plus features a bit better performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has 5 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone 8 Plus and OPPO Find X2 Lite have incredibly similar displays, because although the iPhone 8 Plus has a bit smaller screen, a little bit lower screen pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a bit brighter screen. The iPhone 8 Plus features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a very superior battery life than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity against 2691mAh. OPPO Find X2 Lite has a better camera than iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.