Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, having an 80 score against 74.4. The Google Pixel 3 is a lighter phone than OPPO Find X2 Lite, but they are equally thin. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Lite has just a bit better display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixels number in each display inch, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a larger screen. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 38% greater battery capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Lite takes better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations, a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.