Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a global score of 87.1 against 74.4. The LG Velvet has the same thickness and weight than the OPPO Find X2 Lite. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a little bit better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features just a little better performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG Velvet features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Velvet features just a bit better battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 7% more battery capacity. OPPO Find X2 Lite captures a little bit better photographs and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same resolution back facing camera, the same video definition and a 0.5 inches camera sensor, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a larger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.