Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Power is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a 76.1 score against 74.4. Despite being the best we are comparing, the Moto G Power is a thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone than the OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both devices in this review use Android OS (operating system), but Moto G Power has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10, providing the user some nice extra features.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a better camera than Moto G Power, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a same size aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a camera with a much higher resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Moto G Power features a greater storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Moto G Power features improved battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 24% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.