Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, with an 83.8 score against 74.4. Galaxy A50 is an older cellphone than OPPO Find X2 Lite, but Samsung made it a bit lighter and just a little thinner anyway. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a little higher display density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a superior storage to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a better camera than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a lot higher (4K) video resolution, a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor. OPPO Find X2 Lite and Samsung Galaxy A50 count with incredibly similar batteries duration, although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has just 4000mAh of battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.