Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30 has an overall score of 82.4, which is better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 global score. The Galaxy M30 is an older and a little bit thicker device than OPPO Find X2 Lite, but Samsung managed to make it just a bit lighter anyway. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M30 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a greater camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a much better (4K) video resolution, a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a bigger aperture for better photos in poorly lited situations.
Galaxy M30 features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M30 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M30 has greater battery life than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.