Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, getting a global score of 86.3 against 74.4. Galaxy S10e's body has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, but it is lighter. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S10e has a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4025mAh battery size against 3100mAh. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and videos in poorly lited situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a much larger back camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a camera in the back with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.