Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a general score of 94.8, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 general score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10, so it provides you a couple additional features and performance improvements. The Galaxy S20 design has the same thickness than OPPO Find X2 Lite, but it is a bit lighter.
The Galaxy S20 features a bit more vivid display than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. Galaxy S20 has just a little better performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Lite takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera, faster 30 fps video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy S20 has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 and OPPO Find X2 Lite have quite similar batteries performance, although the Samsung Galaxy S20 has a 1% smaller battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.