Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is a lot better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a overall score of 90.8 against 74.4. Although it's the best device in this comparison, it must be told that it's also a just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier device. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements.
Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better processor than OPPO Find X2 Lite, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a quite better pixel amount in each inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 FE features a bit superior battery life than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. OPPO Find X2 Lite captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a much higher resolution back camera and a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.