Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, getting a 95.4 score against 74.4. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10, giving you some extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra body is newer, but somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier than the OPPO Find X2 Lite.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better display than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a much brighter display, a bit bigger display, a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3088px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's storage for apps and games is very similar to the OPPO Find X2 Lite one, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with improved battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a better camera than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality, a back camera with a much better resolution and a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.