Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a 92.3 score against 74.4. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is just a bit thinner but just a little heavier than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and they were only released with a couple months difference. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10, so it gives lots of additional features and performance improvements.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. OPPO Find X2 Lite has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little lower display density, a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera, a much larger sensor and a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in low light situations.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.