Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, with a general score of 82.2 against 74.4. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect. Despite being the best device we are comparing, Xiaomi Mi 9T's design is older, a bit heavier and somewhat thicker than OPPO Find X2 Lite.
OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a bit better quantity of pixels per display inch, a brighter screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Lite and Xiaomi Mi 9T count with extremely similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Mi 9T has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, they both have the same resolution camera in the back, a 0.5 inches camera sensor, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T has as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as the OPPO Find X2 Lite, both of them have the same internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Lite and Xiaomi Mi 9T have extremely similar batteries performance, although the Xiaomi Mi 9T has just 4000mAh of battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.