Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite, with an 83.8 score against 74.4. Despite being the best in this review, we must note that it's also much older, just a little heavier and a little bit thicker. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a just a little greater screen density, a little larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a bit better performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount. The OPPO Find X2 Lite takes much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and video, a way bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has more internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Lite features improved battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.