Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, having a score of 79 against 74.4. Despite being the best in our current comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both devices in this comparison review use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features superior battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
OPPO Find X2 Lite takes just a bit better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same camera sensor size, the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same resolution back facing camera, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.