Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Ocean | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, having an 88.1 score against 83.1. The iPhone X design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Find X2 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Apple iPhone X has a little bit better processing power than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 2 less and slower processing cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a bit better looking screen than iPhone X, because it has a little greater pixels density, a bigger screen, a brighter screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better camera than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a bigger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited environments, a back camera with way more MP and a much larger camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone X, because it has 256 GB more internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 57% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.