Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Ocean | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| OLED | LTPO |
| 519 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting a 92.1 score against 83.1. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's design has the same thickness than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but it is somewhat heavier. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has newer 14 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a bit superior processor than OPPO Find X2 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a sharper screen than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a bit worse display pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1280 x 2800, it also counts with much more screen brightness and a little larger screen.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a tinier sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also counts with a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 1 TB internal memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features longer battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity instead of 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.