Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Ocean | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 519 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is slightly better than HTC U Ultra, getting a global score of 83.1 against 77. The OPPO Find X2 Pro construction is a lot newer than HTC U Ultra's, but it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a more vivid screen than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger screen, a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a quite better pixels quantity per display inch. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 42% larger battery capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.