Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Ocean | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a global score of 83.1, which is a bit better than LG G7 ThinQ's 81 score. The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a newer cellphone than LG G7 ThinQ, although it's somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has an older 10 version and LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
LG G7 ThinQ features a bit more vivid display than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1440 x 3120px resolution, it also counts with a quite more brightness and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro takes much better photos and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting images or video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.