Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Ocean | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having an 83.1 score against 75.8. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has the previous 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although both of them were released only a couple months apart.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a greater pixel density. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Pro. Both have a Octa-Core processor and 12 GB of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way bigger camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality and better video frame rates.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has improved battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 17 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.