Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Ocean | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a score of 92.9 against 83.1. Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than OPPO Find X2 Pro, although both of them were only released 2 months apart. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little faster processor than Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a better screen density.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has slower video frame rate, a smaller sensor giving a worse image quality and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a better memory for apps and games than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little longer battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 6 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.