Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has an overall score of 83.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy Note 5's overall score of 79.3. The OPPO Find X2 Pro body is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy Note 5. Both of these phones include Android OS, but OPPO Find X2 Pro has 10 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements.
OPPO Find X2 Pro and Galaxy Note 5 feature similar screens, although the Galaxy Note 5 has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, a quite lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bit smaller screen. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 42% greater battery capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality pictures, a larger aperture to take better captures in poorly lited environments and a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.