Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Ocean | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting an 89 score against 83.1. The Galaxy Note10 construction is thinner and lighter than OPPO Find X2 Pro, even when they were only released with a couple months difference. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a brighter display than Galaxy Note10, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution, a little bigger screen and a higher number of pixels per inch of screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has superior battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4260mAh battery size. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.