Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Ocean | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10e is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting an 86.3 score against 83.1. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S10e is older than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, it's construction is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a quite greater pixels quantity per inch in the display, a larger screen and a better 1440 x 3168 resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S10e, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a bit better processing power than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a much larger camera sensor and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.