Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a score of 83.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7's 79.5 general score. The OPPO Find X2 Pro body is extremely newer, but somewhat thicker and notably heavier than Galaxy S7. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a bit more vivid display than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a way smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher display density and a quite more display brightness. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much larger back-facing camera sensor and a way more megapixels back camera.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4260mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.