Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Ocean | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's overall score of 83.1. The Galaxy Z Flip design is somewhat lighter and thinner than OPPO Find X2 Pro, even when they were only released with a few months difference. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, so it gives a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's processor is just as good as the OPPO Find X2 Pro one, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a brighter display than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a little bit better screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures, a bigger diafragm aperture and a camera in the back with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.