Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Sony |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Ocean | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is a little bit better than the Sony Xperia Z4v, having a score of 83.1 against 78.8. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has newer 10 version and Sony Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1, giving you a lot of extra features. The OPPO Find X2 Pro construction is newer, but a little bit thicker and much heavier than Sony Xperia Z4v.
Sony Xperia Z4v counts with just a bit better display than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 2560 x 1440 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels amount per inch of display. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little better performance than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a camera with a much better resolution, a way larger back camera sensor and higher video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.