Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Ocean | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a general score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 score. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is notably older than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, it's design is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a little larger screen, more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has more internal storage.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels, a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a larger camera aperture for better captures and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.