Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 519 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 has a general score of 79.7, which is a little bit better than the HTC One M9's overall score of 77.7. The OPPO Find X2 body is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner, but somewhat heavier than HTC One M9. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the OPPO Find X2 has a more recent 10 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, giving a couple additional features and performance improvements.
The HTC One M9 counts with a bit superior CPU than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an extra graphics co-processor. The OPPO Find X2 has a bit better screen than HTC One M9, because it has a lot larger screen, a just a bit more pixels per screen inch and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels.
OPPO Find X2 has much more memory to store more games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 shoots much clearer videos and photos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also has a bigger sensor which offers a better image and video quality, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The OPPO Find X2 features a really longer battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.