Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Ocean | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is better than the OPPO Find X2, getting a score of 90.8 against 79.7. Galaxy A51 5G's body weights the same than OPPO Find X2, but it's a bit thicker. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A51 5G has the newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10.
OPPO Find X2 has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM. OPPO Find X2 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a little larger display and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, a same size camera sensor and the same video quality, the OPPO Find X2 also has faster 60 fps video frame rate and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures.
Galaxy A51 5G features more memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 7 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.