Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Ocean | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is better than the OPPO Find X2's global score of 79.7. Even though Galaxy A52 is newer than OPPO Find X2, it is just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier. OPPO Find X2 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a little larger screen, a higher display density and a better 1440 x 3168 resolution. Galaxy A52 features just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X2, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures and a much more MP back camera.
The Galaxy A52 features a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.