Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Ocean | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is much better than OPPO Find X2's 79.7 score. Galaxy A52 5G's body is newer than OPPO Find X2's, although it is just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10.
OPPO Find X2 has a much better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a little bigger screen, a better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The OPPO Find X2 features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features just a little bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a slightly better camera than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera and a larger sensor taking higher quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.