Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Ocean | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2's general score of 79.7. Despite being the best we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy Note 20's design is a bit thicker and a little heavier than OPPO Find X2. The Galaxy Note 20's CPU is very similar to the processing unit in OPPO Find X2, and although the Galaxy Note 20 has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
OPPO Find X2 features a much better display than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 also has a better pixels amount per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels, a larger camera aperture for better images and videos in low light situations and better video frame rates.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better battery duration than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.