Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 has a general score of 79.7, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 global score. These phones use Android OS, but OPPO Find X2 has newer 10 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, providing the user a couple additional features. Although the OPPO Find X2 is way newer than Galaxy Note 5, it is just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier.
OPPO Find X2 and Samsung Galaxy Note 5 feature similar screens, although the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a quite smaller display, a little bit lower pixels quantity per display inch and a little bit worse 2560 x 1440 resolution. OPPO Find X2 has a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
OPPO Find X2 has a better processing unit than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more CPU cores and more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 features a way better battery life than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments, faster video frame rate, a much larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality photos and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.