Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than OPPO Find X2, having a score of 80.4 against 79.7. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a somewhat lighter cellphone than the OPPO Find X2, but both are 0.31inches thick. The OPPO Find X2 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a little bit greater quantity of pixels in each inch of display, a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a larger screen. OPPO Find X2 counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the OPPO Find X2 also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Find X2 features superior battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 31 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.