Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Ocean | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the OPPO Find X2, with a score of 90.8 against 79.7. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 FE has newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 has Android 10. Despite being the best in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also a a little heavier and just a little bit thicker device.
The OPPO Find X2 has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution, a bit bigger display and a higher display pixel density.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a way more megapixels back facing camera and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and video.
The Galaxy S20 FE has a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.